IDblog ... an information design weblog

May 14, 2003
What were they thinking?

I'm a bit surprised that this isn't getting raked over the coals on WebWord, but this May 2003 story on using photos to increase trust in a website is just downright depressing. Surely they jest?!? Using Flash to render an article?!? Is it April 1st?

Look, this is not an anti-Flash diatribe. Me? I like Flash, and love cool applications of it. And, even if they are doing the bull in the china shop thing, Macromedia is trying to make Flash accessible.

But an article?!? I'm waiting for the "heh heh, you were part of our psychology experiment to prove that webloggers have no sense of humor" or the "gee, Flash really isn't accessible" punchline. What am I missing here?

If I sound a bit punchy, well, maybe I am. We're trying to promote good usability practices at work, while at the same time, we're getting pressured for "cutting edge." Yikes. This is all they need. A usability firm that uses Flash so that you get 5 seconds of "sizzle" while the article loads. It would have been one thing if it was good Flash, but this?

So much for separating content from presentation. Yee gads.

Comments

Even if this was good Flash...Wow, there is so much wrong with this. I'll ask as well, what the were they thinking??!? From a "Web usability" firm?? This HAS to be a joke.

-- Posted by Keith on May 19, 2003 02:01 PM
Post a comment
Note: Your comment will be reviewed prior to posting to minimize comment spam. Management regrets the inconvenience!


IDblog is Beth Mazur tilting at power law windmills. A little bit Internet, a little bit technology, a little bit society, and a lot about designing useful information products. Send your cards and letters to .

search this site
archives
categories
key links
groups
about moi
feeds
amphetadesk
rdf
xml
gratuitous right-nav promos


(pdf)




Creative Commons License; click for details

Powered by Movable Type